It was a
warm early morning of October. The year was 2003. I set out to play my first
tournament of Chess in high school. My opponent was a scholar, the topper of
the batch! And here I was, a rookie in the world of chess. Or so he thought. 3rd
move of the game, I delivered the knock-out punch, I took his queen! The
expression on his face told the story. It was of utter disbelief! He was using
the “Scholar’s Mate” move on me. He was supposed to win the game in the next
move! How the hell did this happen? His expression slowly changed to surrender
and in another 45 mins, I had won the game. This experience gave me my first
major learning in chess and in life alike…
Having sat
through multiple sessions on “Strategy” during my B-School days, I was always
intrigued by the fabulous moves played by businesses around the world.
Acquisitions, advertising, promotions, product launches, so on and so forth
always threw multiple lessons in business strategy to be amazed by. One
question remained unanswered – It’s okay for us to retrospectively analyze the
moves but when these businesses are actually into these situations, how do they
come up with these masterstrokes?
Some claim
it is experience accumulated over the years. Some say it is having ‘expert
analysts’ on their side which works. Some claim it is ‘compare and contrast’
with other businesses that have been there and done that. But if all that had
to be true, wouldn’t it be applicable to both sides of the table? Wouldn’t both
competing businesses have access to the same information and have services of
equally smart analysts? How then, would one side ever emerge victorious?
Having
spent some time in the corporate world, I see a different side to this hype of
“business strategy”. Can we consider it like playing a game of chess? And the
business moves we make, inspired by the moves in chess? Let’s dig further in to
this. Each company has different business units called verticals. Each of these
units has different capabilities, different set of objectives. Each of them
competes with a similar business unit of another company. Just like the pieces
on a chess board. However individualistic, these pieces are working towards a
common purpose – To get the opposition king, to achieve the overall company
goal.
The game of
chess has numerous teachings to offer which can be applied to a business
scenario. For one, chess is a game where you keep your cards close to your
heart. Play one move at a time without giving the opponent a hint of your
larger game plan. Else, you could get drawn in and beaten at your own game!
Think of TATA Steel’s acquisition of Corus where TATA went head on for it and a
silent Brazilian firm CSN played smart and made TATA Steel pay so much more
than it would have otherwise paid.
How often
in a game of chess that we sacrifice a pawn for a queen. Or rather use a piece
to serve a larger purpose in the game. Then think of what P&G did by
introducing Luvs Diaper in the market. To serve the larger purpose in a fight
between Pampers and Huggies, Luvs was “sacrificed”. On the other hand, when
P&G was to make an entry into the market with Oral B, Colgate flooded the
market and occupied all available rack space. Just like sometimes, how we
position our pieces to occupy strategic squares on a chess board, not to attack
the opponent but just to restrict their movement.
The
importance of the king is well emphasized in Chess, just like it needs to be in
business. If your king falls, the empire, however large, will collapse!
(Ramalinga Raju and Satyam?) In chess, the pieces fight while the king does not
come into the fray until the very end when the knock-out punch needs to be
delivered. He is protected from all sides and exposed just when needed to
check-mate the opposition. Just like business, where your highest authority
will not be exposed until the very end, so that the power associated with the
highest authority does not get diluted. Think of the letter written by Sachin
Bansal to buyers after the Big Billion Day disaster. Would it have gotten the
respect that it did had Sachin Bansal been exposed too much before? Think of
how major companies associate their brand name only with certain products at a
certain stage. Protection of the ultimate power center you would think?
There is so
much more in a game of chess that can be related to businesses. Think of giving
the opposition a “check”, a threat with an intention to make them play a
certain move which they were not willing to. Then think of Google’s move of
acquiring Motorola to threaten Samsung thus getting the desired usage
restrictions on Android. Think of a head-on battle between the queens in chess.
Reminds you of Sprite vs Dew or even the current e-commerce scenario in India?
A good player of chess can always think 3 moves ahead of his opponent and then
the opponent just follows terms dictated by the leader. Think of Apple and its
products? A weaker player sometimes plays the slow game waiting for the
opponent to make a mistake and then pounce on them. Like years ago when No. 2 Pepsi
pounced on market leader Coca-Cola after they changed their formulation and it
went wrong (“They changed my coke” campaign). The game plan in chess needs to
evolve with time. You cannot always win a game with a plan you started with.
Think of Kodak and Nokia who failed to evolve their game plan. A game of chess
always gives you an opportunity to make a come-back if you play the right
moves. Think of how Cadbury roped in Mr. Amitabh Bachchan to endorse it after
the insects’ disaster.
Today, we
see how a new Fogg deodorant beat heavyweights like Axe to become the market
leader. Or how a Patanjali group by Baba Ramdev is threatening the likes of
HUL, ITC and P&G in India! Or how a small brand like Micromax has captured
market share like no one imagined. This brings me to the most important
learning from a game of chess that any business can take. A lesson my opponent,
the scholar, learnt on that October 2003 morning in high school. Never
underestimate your opposition, else 1 wrong move, can be the game-ender for
you! Brings me to this intriguing thought that may be, just may be businesses
look at strategy like playing chess. Simulation of your business situation on a
chess board might just give you the right move that you need to make to emerge
victorious!
Very true and apt comparison.
ReplyDeleteThank You :-)
Delete